You Are Here: Home » Daily News » Recount Fizzles

Recount Fizzles

Recount 056

By Phreddy Wischusen

The Michigan Citizen

When the Wayne County Board of Canvassers read Speckin Forensic Laboratories’ assessment that 19 of Detroit’s Aug. 6 primary ballots were most likely all written by separate individuals, in other words, not fraudulent, exasperated candidates and volunteer challengers erupted.

At the Sept. 23 meeting of the board, accountant and recount petitioner Tom Barrow told the board 19 ballots were in no way a statistically adequate measure. Board Chair Carol Larkin replied that Barrow had picked those ballots himself. Barrow counter-argued that those 19 ballots were selected on the first day of an almost month long recount process. They were a sample of different types of handwriting that were repeated through many precincts, he said. However, as the recount progressed, challengers identified and paired hand-writing samples that looked identical, Barrow continued. The board possessed those ballots in sealed envelopes.

Neither Speckin Forensics, the handwriting analysts retained by the board, nor Tom Riley, the hand-writing analyst retained by Mike Duggan, had examined the paired ballots. Consenting to Barrow’s objections, the board spread all of the ballots from 29 precincts and absent voter counting boards that Barrow believed had ballots with identical handwriting. The board allowed Barrow and mayoral candidate/recount petitioner Jean Vortkamp to inspect the ballots with them. At the conclusion of the examination, Vice Board Chair Krista Hartounian saw no probable cause in examining any more handwriting. The other two board members unanimously agreed.

Nine identical ballots with the name Micheal Duggan (sic) printed on them “were sent to the Chief Judge of Circuit Court and the (WayneCounty) Prosecutor for review per Michigan Election Law,” Larkin told the Michigan Citizen. Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy’s office told the Michigan Citizen they had forwarded the issue along to the Michigan Attorney General. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette would not comment on whether he intended to or was investigating the issue.

Sept. 24 recount petitioners Tom Barrow, D. Etta Wilcoxon, Monica Lewis-Patrick, Derek Muhammad, Regina Ross and Danetta Simpson sued the board to force them to continue fraud investigations. Wayne Co. Circuit Court Judge Robert Colombo, presiding over the case, admitted he had donated money to Duggan’s campaign, plaintiffs said. He refused to recuse himself, and petitions to higher court did not result in a change of judges. Colombo ruled in favor of the board ending their investigation.

On Sep. 26, the board concluded their recount, with no candidates’ standing altered.

Although, the issue of the nine identically printed “Micheal Duggan” (sic) ballots remains unsettled, Detroit City Clerk Janice M. Winfrey has already had absent voter ballots for the November general election printed, and without legally required approval of the election commission. Various recount petitioners are calling on Schuette to continue the investigation.


Clip to Evernote

About The Author

Number of Entries : 12

© 2012 The Michigan Citizen All Rights Reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Scroll to top